Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wilfred Holmes v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 19-1089
Defendant / Appellee:
N.J. GOV. CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, Both individually and in his official capacity as the Govenor of the State of New Jersey, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, Both individually and in his offiical capacity as the cahirman of the N.J. State Parole Board, STUART RABNER, Both individually and in his offiical capacity as the chief justice of the Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILFRED LEE HOLMES
HOLMES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2016cv01434
Plaintiff:
WILFRED LEE HOLMES
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, DAVID W. THOMAS, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVENOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DIMAIO
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
GOLIA v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2015cv01096
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GOLIA
Defendant:
DAVID W. THOMAS and DAVID M. BUONCRISTIANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KATES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2014cv05769
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv03746
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. TORREZ et al
as 1:2012cv03518
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WHITE
Defendant:
ERIC TORREZ, DAVID W. THOMAS, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
