Cases 1 - 10 of 27
MILLER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv21823
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. MILLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fusco v. Kellow et al
as 1:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Pasqualino Di Fusco
Defendant:
Michael W. Sutherlin, David J. Miller, Mark Spurbeck and others
Nominal Defendant:
Peabody Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phelps v. Peabody Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01747
Defendant:
Michael W. Sutherlin, David J. Miller, Stephen E. Gorman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Peabody Energy Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark Phelps
ADAMS et al v. MILLER et al
as 2:2020cv00217
Defendant:
DAVID J. MILLER and FREEMAN MILLER
Plaintiff:
DOUG REED and NANCY ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
PARIKH v. RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17607
Defendant:
JOHN R. WHITTEN, RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JEFFREY A. AUKERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
NIRAV PARIKH
Stein v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01615
Plaintiff:
William Stein
Defendant:
John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc., Jeffrey A. Aukerman and others
Rosenblatt v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01559
Defendant:
Nanometrics Incorporated, John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Stein v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01550
Defendant:
John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc., Jeffrey A. Aukerman and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
MILLER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv04172
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raul v. Albaugh et al
as 1:2018cv00930
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Raul
Defendant:
James F. Albaugh , Amy E. Alving , Christopher L. Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
