Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Wicks v. Kimberly Barkley, et al
as 13-3624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Probation and Parole, MARIROSA LAMAS, Facility Manager of Rockview, TIM MILLER, Correctional Class & Program Manager of Rockview and others
Wicks v. Macbenlee-Brown et al
as 3:2013cv02048
Petitioner:
David Bryant Wicks
Respondent:
Renita Camile Macbenlee-Brown, Colleran Firm & Associates, Vani Dadolu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Wicks v. Kimberly Barkley, et al
as 13-1171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Probation and Parole, MARIROSA LAMAS, Facility Manager of Rockview, TIM MILLER, Correctional Class & Program Managerof Rockview and others
Wicks v. Barkley et al
as 3:2012cv02203
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Barkley, Marirosa Lamas , Tim Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wicks v. Corbit et al
as 3:2012cv01614
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
Tom Corbit and Court Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wicks v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 12-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, SUE KARPINSKI, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES and others
David Wicks v. Jeffrey Beard
as 10-2510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, PH.D. The Department of Corrections
WICKS v. BEARD
as 2:2009cv06142
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WICKS v. HARVILLE
as 2:2009cv00363
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
DAVID HARVILLE, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
