Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bailey v. Thompson
as 1:2023cv00219
Petitioner:
Richard G. Bailey
Respondent:
R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAILEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv10972
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. BAILEY and THE ESTATE OF ZORA Z. BAILEY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMILLERI v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03897
Plaintiff:
DINAH M. CAMILLERI
Defendant:
WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., MICHAEL G. BAILEY, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Israel v. Bailey et al
as 1:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
Matthew Israel
Defendant:
Pamela G. Bailey, Jean Hobby, Thomas J. Hook and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS et al v. DEMREX INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011mc00264
Plaintiff:
OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS and TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS
Defendant:
DEMREX INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., ALTCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., BARRY C. PORTNOY and others
Garnishee:
FOX CHASE BANK, HATBORO FEDERAL SAVINGS , FULTON BANK and others
BAILEY v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61462
Plaintiff:
MILTON G. BAILEY, MILTON G. BAILEY, MILTON G. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BAILEY et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv60914
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. BAILEY and DORIS G. BAILEY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
