Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
GIBSON v. WENEROWICZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv07751
Petitioner: HOWARD GIBSON
Respondent: MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willie Polite, et al v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-4156
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIE E. POLITE, GREGORY STOVER, RAYMOND WILLIAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee: PA DEPT CORR, DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTY GEN PA
POLITE et al v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv04344
Petitioner: WILLIE E. POLITE, ALLEN GINN, GREGORY STOVER and others
Respondent: PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PA. DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POLITE et al v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2010cv03286
Petitioner: WILLIE E. POLITE, ALLEN GINN, GREGORY STOVER and others
Respondent: MIKE WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GIBSON v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00266
Petitioner: HOWARD GIBSON
Respondent: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Howard Gibson
as 09-2870
Petitioner: In re: HOWARD GIBSON
Respondent: DA PHILADELPHIA
DICKERSON et al v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2009cv01914
Petitioner: ANTHONY DICKERSON, DAVON COLLINS, EDWARD MONROE and others
Respondent: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anthony Dickerson, et al v. David DiGuglielmo
as 08-2832
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY DICKERSON, DEVON COLLINS, EDWARD LAYMAN MONROE and others
Defendant: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
DICKERSON et al v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2007cv02984
Petitioner: ANTHONY DICKERSON, DAVON COLLINS, EDWARD MONROE and others
Respondent: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?