Cases 1 - 10 of 37
LOMBARDO v. LEONARD et al
as 2:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE LOMBARDO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BRYAN LEONARD and IMS TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mzaouak v. Im et al
as 2:2023cv04526
Plaintiff:
Mostafa Mzaouak
Defendant:
Michael Im, JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CHAN et al v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv03278
Plaintiff:
KUENG IAM CHAN, TAM IM F. and WAI CHEONG CHAN
Defendant:
GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HUSBAND v. IMS PRODUCTIONS INC.
as 2:2020cv00984
Defendant:
IMS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HUSBAND
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 3102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PGT TRUCKING, INC. v. TRAXYS NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01356
Plaintiff:
PGT TRUCKING, INC.
Defendant:
TRAXYS NORTH AMERICA LLC and IM/EX TRANSPORTATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ALLIANCE LIFE SCIENCES CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. FABRICZI et al
as 2:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
ALLIANCE LIFE SCIENCES CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
LASZLO FABRICZI and QUINTILES IMS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
