Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PAMBAR ASSOCIATES LLC v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2019cv17015
Defendant:
ELEANOR D CRAWFORD and JAMES A CRAWFORD
Plaintiff:
PAMBAR ASSOCIATES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRAWFORD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv56174
Plaintiff:
JAMES E CRAWFORD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CRAWFORD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv53691
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CRAWFORD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53649
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CRAWFORD v. MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, et al
as 2:2008cv77281
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, A-BEST CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
VERNON et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2007cv73839
Plaintiff:
JAMES VERNON and JAMES NMI CRAWFORD
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATKINS et al
as 2:2007cv64472
Plaintiff:
DAISY E. ATKINS, DAISY E. ATKINS, PHYLLIS NMN HILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CRAWFORD et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP et al
as 2:2007cv60617
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. CRAWFORD and CATHIE M. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, Acands Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
AMIRIANTZ, et al v. CRAWFORD, et al
as 1:2000cv00494
Plaintiff:
V. GEORGE AMIRIANTZ
Defendant:
JAMES A. CRAWFORD, JAMES W. WEINSTEIN, STEVE A. WYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
