Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Stapleton v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2020cv01581
Defendant:
Lieutenant Shirk, Mr. Spaulding, Dr. Kevin Pigos and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Little v. Warden D. Ebbert, et al
as 19-2543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. LITTLE
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCIS FASCIANA, KEVIN PIGOS, WARDEN DAVID EBBERT and others
Cunningham v. Thomas et al
as 1:2017cv02069
Plaintiff:
Harold Cunningham
Defendant:
J.T. Thomas, White, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cedric Walker v. David Ebbert, et al
as 17-2460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC TYRONE WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EBBERT, Warden, A. SIMMONS, C.O., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director Federal Prison and others
Cedric Walker v. David Ebbert, et al
as 17-2344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC TYRONE WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EBBERT, Warden, A. SIMMONS, C.O., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director Federal Prison and others
Skinner v. Meyer, et al
as 3:2017cv00987
Plaintiff:
Shakir Malik Skinner
Defendant:
David J Ebbert, F. Alama, Kevin Pigos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCarthy v. Edinger et al
as 4:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
Andrew Edinger, Kevin Pigos, Mental Health Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kareem Millhouse v. Francis Fasciana, et al
as 17-1309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS FASCIANA, ALAMA and KEVIN PIGOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
