Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Scott v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., N. Anthony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Dixon v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., N. Anthony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
JUSTICE, II v. DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05340
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS INC., DOUGLAS M FAMBROUGH III, J. KEVIN BUCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Kent v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01716
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv13125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. KOPPEL, M.D. et al
as 2:2021cv03413
Defendant:
BRIAN BEAGIN, D.C., CLIFTON PAIN AND REHAB LLC, VINCENT SARACENO, D.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO CASUALTY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HINES v. GOWEN et al
as 2:2020cv04673
Defendant:
LEON O. MOULDER, JR., ROBERTO CUCA, MAXINE GOWEN and others
Nominal Defendant:
TREVENA, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRAD HINES
MCKERNAN v. GOWEN et al
as 2:2019cv05314
Defendant:
LEON O. MOULDER, JR., TREVENA, INC., MAXINE GOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
LISA MCKERNAN
KROTZ v. SOERGEL et al
as 2:2019cv04399
Defendant:
LEON O. MOULDER, JR., JULIE MCHUGH, MAXINE GOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
TROY KROTZ
Nominal Defendant:
TREVENA HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matthews et al v. Gowen et al
as 1:2019cv00363
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Matthews and Leslie Matthews
Defendant:
Leon O. Moulder, Jr., Roberto Cuca, Maxine Gowen and others
Nominal Defendant:
Trevena, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
