Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS, LLC v. MAACO OF BROOKLYN, INC.
as 2:2021cv01187
Defendant:
MAACO OF BROOKLYN, INC.
Plaintiff:
AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IBRAHIM v. GREEN et al
as 2:2019cv17379
Defendant:
ROBERT BRUNO, RONALD GREEN and MAACO COLLISION REPAIR & AUTO PAINTING
Plaintiff:
JAMEEL IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
IBRAHIM v. GREEN et al
as 2:2019cv16555
Defendant:
ROBERT BRUNO, RONALD GREEN, MAACO COLLISION REPAIR AND AUTO PAINTING and others
Plaintiff:
JAMEEL IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAACO FRANCHISOR SPV LLC v. BODYWORKS & PAINTING LTD, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04728
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISOR SPV LLC
Defendant:
BODYWORKS & PAINTING LTD, INC., JOSEPH D. LILE and LAURIE L. LILE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALAYAN et al v. MAACO ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05284
Plaintiff:
VIRAINDER BALAYAN , USHA HOODA and VUV, INC.
Defendant:
MAACO ENTERPRISES, INC., MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC and MAACO FRANCHISOR SPV LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAARDER v. MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC
as 2:2015cv05335
Plaintiff:
JAMES GAARDER
Defendant:
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC v. FAVILA et al
as 2:2014cv02837
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC
Defendant:
ANASTASIO E. FAVILA, ANITA Q. FAVILA and TEYAC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC v. VETTORINO
as 2:2014cv02583
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC
Defendant:
JOSEPH V. VETTORINO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. MARK VITALE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02395
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
MARK VITALE, INC. and MARK VITALE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
