Cases 1 - 10 of 18
JOHNSON v. MARIO AMIR JOHNSON ESTATE ET AL. et al
as 2:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
MARIO AMIR JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARIO AMIR JOHNSON ESTATE ET AL., SA'NYA MONE' JOHNSON ESTATE, SHAR'DAE CAMILLE JOHNSON ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. AXTELL et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Defendant:
THOMAS AXTELL, JOHN DOE I (FICTITIOUS NAME), JOHN DOE II (FICTITIOUS NAME) and others
Plaintiff:
MARY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2020cv03431
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMITH, ISA RICHARDSON, JOHANA RAHMAN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and OFFICERS JOHN DOES #1-#100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv05426
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
BONNIE MARIE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05020
Plaintiff:
TERESA MARIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv04057
Plaintiff:
GLADYS MARIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ORTIZ et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05875
Plaintiff:
ESTHER ORTIZ , EDWARD CARTER , CYNDEE CARTY and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. THE SOUTHLAND CORP.
as 2:2011cv07380
Plaintiff:
MARY JOHNSON
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JOHNSON et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06364
Plaintiff:
MARY JOHNSON , WILLIAM B. STOREY and MONTE LAVON RODDENBERRY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
