Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Parker v. VisionQuest National, LTD
as 2:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Parker
Defendant:
VisionQuest National, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Parker v. SoClean Inc
as 2:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. PARKER
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARKER v. HETERO DRUGS, LTD. et al
as 1:2022cv02419
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GLENN PARKER
Defendant:
HETERO DRUGS, LTD., HETERO LABS, LTD., ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARKER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03243
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WARREN PARKER
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55822
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. PARKER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PARKER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv00843
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. PARKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PARKER v. ARMSTRONG WORLD et al
as 2:2010cv67000
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. PARKER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD, AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE CO., CAPE INSULATION CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER et al v. ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv69302
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. PARKER and IRMA B. PARKER
Defendant:
ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC., CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCALISTER et al v. ACANDS, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv64478
Plaintiff:
CLYDE MCALISTER, CLYDE MCALISTER, MILDRED J. MCALISTER and others
Defendant:
ACANDS, INCORPORATED, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
