Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fahnestock v. Conway et al
as 3:2020cv02353
Defendant: Les Pauling, Troy Tyson, Hank Klub and others
Plaintiff: Moses Fahnestock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01418
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RUHL v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00466
Plaintiff: TERRY G. RUHL
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RUHL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv40114
Plaintiff: MARK S. RUHL
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RUHL et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66006
Plaintiff: WARREN RUHL and MARTHA RUHL
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03788
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv03788
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
RUHL v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33898
Plaintiff: MARK S. RUHL
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
REEB MILLWORK CORPORATION et al v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2008cv01105
Plaintiff: REEB MILLWORK CORPORATION, RUHLE AND KERR ASSOCIATES, LLC and DELMARVA SASH AND DOOR
Defendant: HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
RUHL (DAIKIN) v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al
as 2:2007cv02580
Plaintiff: JANET RUHL (DAIKIN) and JANET RUHL (DAIKIN)
Defendant: WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?