Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1357
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1209
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1210
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1211
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO, JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN, State Employee and others
Lawrence Murrell, Jr. v. Pennsylvania State Employees C, et al
as 20-3525
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN KRAUSE, P.S.E.C.U. Investigator, PENNSYLVANIA STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION, P.S.E.C.U. and GEORGE RUDOLPH, P.S.E.C.U. Bank President
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE MURRELL, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Zhaojin Ke v. Pennsylvania State Employees R, et al
as 20-2047
Defendant:
GERALD J. VILLELLA, SALVATORE DARIGO, in both his official and individual capacities and PENNSYLVANIA STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZHAOJIN DAVID KE
In re: Zhaojin Ke, et al
as 20-1693
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, SALVATORE DARIGO, in both his official and individual capacities and GERALD J. VILLELLA
Petitioner:
In re: ZHAOJIN DAVID KE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
