Cases 1 - 10 of 7,385
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. ADVANCED INTERIORS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02150
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUND and others
Defendant:
ADVANCED INTERIORS INC. and GARY LAINE HOUBERG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Geyer et al v. Montgomery as trustee of the Trust Agreement of Judith D. Plair dated August 19, 2003
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Amanda Geyer, Robert Plair and Tina Carey
Defendant:
Rebecca Montgomery as trustee of the Trust Agreement of Judith D. Plair dated August 19, 2003
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
THE ESTATE OF KRISTEN MCCARTNEY, DONNA DOCKERY, and SEAN MCCARTNEY v. SETON HALL UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2024cv06179
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF KRISTEN MCCARTNEY, DONNA DOCKERY, and SEAN MCCARTNEY
Defendant:
SETON HALL UNIVERSITY, THE SETON HALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, THE SETON HALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
THE ESTATE OF KRISTEN MCCARTNEY, DONNA DOCKERY, and SEAN MCCARTNEY v. SETON HALL UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2024cv06179
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF KRISTEN MCCARTNEY, DONNA DOCKERY, and SEAN MCCARTNEY
Defendant:
SETON HALL UNIVERSITY, THE SETON HALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, THE SETON HALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND et al v. QUINN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 2:2024cv06167
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. ANNUITY FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. HEALTH FUND and others
Defendant:
QUINN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SWETTCORP. D/B/A ELEVATOR TECHNICAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL FUND and others
Defendant:
SWETTCORP. doing business as ELEVATOR TECHNICAL SERVICE and SHEILA SWETT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lesroy Browne v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust, et al
as 24-1896
Plaintiff:
LESROY E. BROWNE, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST, also known as NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MASTER STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1, WILMINGTON TRUST CO, as Trustee for National Collegiate Student Loan Trust, US BANK NA, in its Role as Special Servicer for the National Collegiate Student Loan Trust and others
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee for the Benefit of Registered Holders of J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Multifamily Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates v. MM-FCDC Partners, L.P.
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee for the Benefit of Registered Holders of J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Multifamily Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Defendant:
MM-FCDC Partners, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. SEASONS RECYCLING & SALVAGE
as 2:2024cv06063
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
SEASONS RECYCLING & SALVAGE
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. JDS, INC.
as 2:2024cv06066
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
JDS INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
