Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
KRAKOWIECKI et al v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00518
Defendant:
CHARLES CHRISTIAN WALKER, SEWING COLLECTION INC., CHARLES C. WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
MELISSA KRAKOWIECKI and MATTHEW KRAKOWIECKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carro et al v. Split Rock Resort et al
as 3:2021cv00905
Defendant:
Split Rock Resort d/b/a Split Rock, Split Rock Development, LLC, Stabilis Split Rock JV, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Julie Carro and Joseph Carro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DIAZ MACHADO v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04458
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO DIAZ MACHADO
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., BONNEVILLE BILLING AND COLLECTIONS, INC., ACCOUNT SERVICES COLLECTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
NOLL v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03931
Plaintiff:
LINDA NOLL
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, TEK COLLECT, INC. and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
