Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Montolis v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03118
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S) XI-XX, JOHN DOE(S) I-X, RASIER, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Montolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SANTIAGO v. SIMMONS et al
as 2:2024cv02683
Defendant:
COURTNEY SIMMONS, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and PORTIER, LLC
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Feghali Foods Inc. PSP v. Khosrowshahi et al
as 1:2024cv00758
Defendant:
Ronald Sugar, Nikki Krishnamurthy, John Thain and others
Plaintiff:
Feghali Foods Inc. PSP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
ZAHAN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
EASRAT ZAHAN
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jain v. Khosrowshahi et al
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Rohit Jain
Defendant:
Dara Khosrowshahi, Ronald Sugar, Ursula Burns and others
MELENDEZ v. DAI et al
as 2:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
JAJAIRA MELENDEZ
Defendant:
DALIANG DAI, RASIER-PA, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Garcia v. Titan et al
as 2:2024cv01036
Administrator:
Maritza L Garcia
Defendant:
Gara Titan, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
MATOS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
as 2:2023cv05038
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MATOS
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
STALLWORTH v. MCHUGH et al
as 1:2023cv21333
Plaintiff:
TYSHAN STALLWORTH
Defendant:
LOIS MCHUGH, RAISER, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
