Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01875
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv17355
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Isaivedigni v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv01146
Petitioner:
Effong Okon Isaivedigni
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, USCIS District Director and DHS Local Removal Officers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
OVALLE v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2007cv03498
Petitioner:
HECTOR OVALLE
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ALBERTO GONZALES, USCIS DISTRICT DIRECTOR, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Xhema v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 3:2007cv01353
Petitioner:
Arsim Xhema
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), US Atty General, California Service Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Misere v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 3:2007cv01285
Petitioner:
Marie Lydie Misere
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Alberto Gonzales, USCIS District Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Araya v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 1:2007cv01156
Petitioner:
Erick Cesar Araya
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Alberto Gonzales, USCIS District Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
LEBID et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 2:2007cv01682
Petitioner:
ALEKSANDR LEBID and ARTEM LEBID
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), ALBERTO GONZALES, USCIS DISTRICT DIRECTOR, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
