Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Thomas WashamIn re: Thomas Washam
as 23-2264
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS WASHAM
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
WASHAM v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2023cv02586
Petitioner:
THOMAS S. WASHAM
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washam v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv01171
Plaintiff:
Thomas Washam
Defendant:
George M. Little, Kevin Ransom and S.R. Inniss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Washam v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 21-3073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WASHAM
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and KATTNER
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Washam v. Washman et al
as 1:2021cv01391
Petitioner:
Thomas Washam
Respondent:
Thomas Washman, Kevin Ransom, Mr. Kattner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Washam v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 19-2433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WASHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
The People of Pennsylvania ex rel et al v. Shapiro
as 2:2019cv02141
Respondent:
JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
The People of Pennsylvania ex rel and THOMAS WASHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
The People of Pennsylvania ex rel et al v. Shapiro
as 1:2019cv00838
Respondent:
Joshua D. Shapiro and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
The People of Pennsylvania ex rel and Thomas Washam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHAM v. WASHAM et al
as 2:2018cv00777
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WASHAM
Defendant:
THOMAS WASHAM and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Washam v. Superintendent Dallas SCI
as 17-1283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS WASHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
