Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
FEAGIN v. LAWSON et al
as 2:2024cv05835
Plaintiff: EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant: MR. LAWSON, JEANETTE MATOS and MR. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FEAGIN v. SETON HALL LAW SCHOOL
as 2:2023cv11824
Plaintiff: MISS EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant: SETON HALL LAW SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FEAGIN v. THE CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2023cv00773
Plaintiff: EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant: THE CITY OF NEWARK, CRYSTAL COCHRAN, JILL DEROIS CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FEAGIN v. THE CITY OF NEWARK
as 2:2022cv00273
Plaintiff: EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant: THE CITY OF NEWARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Ejectment
FEAGIN v. CLINTON et al
as 2:2021cv10481
Defendant: DOROTHY MITCHELL, JILL DELORIOS CLINTON, DEREK SIMMONS and others
Plaintiff: EVETTE C. FEAGIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEAGIN v. COCHCRAN-SIMMONS et al
as 2:2019cv16704
Plaintiff: EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant: NEW HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH, MRS. CRYSTAL COCHCRAN-SIMMONS and MR. DEREK LAFOY SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12744
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEAGIN v. COCHRAN et al
as 2:2018cv17155
Defendant: CRYSTAL COCHRAN, MS. MUOBO NEWKIRK ENAWOHO and DEREK LAFOY SIMMONS
Plaintiff: MISS EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEAGIN v. ROMNEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv03134
Plaintiff: EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant: MITT ROMNEY, JAMES TREFFINGER, CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEAGIN v. ROMNEY et al
as 2:2017cv02765
Plaintiff: EVETTE C. FEAGIN
Defendant: MITT ROMNEY, DOROTHEA WERTZ and MUOBO NEWKIRK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?