Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Dominion Coal Corporation v. DOWCP
as 24-1565
Petitioner:
DOMINION COAL CORPORATION
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and EVANS RATLIFF, JR.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
LIBRE IMMIGRATION SERVICES, INC.
US v. Nelson Evans
as 24-4037
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NELSON EVANS
US v. Timothy Evans
as 23-4744
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BRANDON EVANS
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
US v. James Evans
as 23-4664
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EVANS
US v. Tray Evans
as 23-4639
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAY DE'VONTA EVANS, a/k/a Scrap
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 23-1836
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
