Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bryant Davis v. Darius Horton
as 24-6299
Plaintiff:
BRYANT E. DAVIS, a/k/a Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
DARIUS HORTON, EXPRESS FUNERAL FUNDING, LLC, HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Wilmer Jerome Knight v. A. Cutchen
as 17-7008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILMER JEROME KNIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
A. CUTCHENS, Officer/Sergeant, MR. MAC-VEAN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer and MR. HORTON, Institutional Investigator Lieutenant
Shannon Lancaster v. Justin Horton
as 17-6298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON MILES LANCASTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN HORTON, 0729 and LORIN WILLLIAMS
Leon Ferguson-El v. J. Horton
as 16-7705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON PATT FERGUSON EL
Defendant - Appellee:
J. HORTON, Institutioinal Investigator, BURNETTE, Institutional Investigator and T. DOWELL, Institutional Program Manager
Bruce Koenig v. Bobby Shearin
as 15-7103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY SHEARIN, M. YACENECH and CO II CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GUTILLO
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND and MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION
Bruce Koenig v. State of Maryland
as 14-7075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION, BOBBY SHEARIN and others
David Hoskins v. US
as 12-6954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. HOSKINS, NOVELLA L. RIVERA BURRELL, JAH'VAUGHN M. BURRELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Willie Horton v. George West
as 11-6537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE WEST, Esq., GARY JACKSON, Esq. and DAVID BARGER, Esq.
Jonathan Riches v. Billie Estes
as 08-7419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY HAYGOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLIE SOL ESTES and RAYMOND K. HORTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
