Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Village of Bald Head Island v. U. S. Army Corps of Eng
as 11-2368
Plaintiff:
VILLAGE OF BALD HEAD ISLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
TOWN OF CASWELL BEACH and TOWN OF OAK ISLAND, NORTH CAROLINA
Village of Bald Head Island v. U. S. Army Corps of Eng
as 11-2366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VILLAGE OF BALD HEAD ISLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor/Defendant:
TOWN OF CASWELL BEACH and TOWN OF OAK ISLAND, NORTH CAROLINA
Deerfield Plantation Phase II- v. Deertrack Golf, Inc.
as 11-2253
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEERFIELD PLANTATION PHASE II-B PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
DEERTRACK GOLF, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers, US Army Corps of Engineers, TREY JORDAN, Lieutenant Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District and others
EarthReports v. United States Army Corps of En
as 11-2178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARTHREPORTS, d/b/a Patuxent Riverkeeper
Plaintiff:
PATUXENT RIVERKEEPER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS, a/k/a USACE, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, a/k/a Van, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
WOODMORE TOWNE CENTRE LLC
Deerfield Plantation Phase II- v. United States Army Corp
as 11-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEERFIELD PLANTATION PHASE II-B PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CHARLESTON DISTRICT, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers, US Army Corps of Engineers, TREY JORDAN, Lieutenant Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District and others
Pat Webster v. USDA
as 11-1739
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAT WEBSTER, JOEM WEBSTER, CHARLES FOLTZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, by and through its Agency, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, POTOMAC VALLEY CONSERVATION DISTRICT, HARDY COUNTY COMMISSION and others
AVX Corporation v. United States of America
as 11-1697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AVX CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
HORRY LAND COMPANY, INCORPORATED and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Friends of Back Bay et al v. US Army Corps of Eng et al
as 11-1184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIENDS OF BACK BAY and BACK BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION, LTD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of The Army, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. Apogee Coal Company
as 10-2187
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION and WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
APOGEE COAL COMPANY and HOBET MINING COMPANY, LLC
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shenandoah Valley Network v. J. Capka
as 10-1954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHENANDOAH VALLEY NETWORK, COALITION FOR SMARTER GROWTH, ROCKBRIDGE AREA CONSERVATION COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ALLAMONG
Defendant - Appellee:
J. RICHARD CAPKA, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, MARY PETERS, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation and ROBERTO FONSECA-MARTINEZ, Virginia Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration
Intervenor:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PIERCE HOMER VIRGINIA SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, DAVID S. EKERN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
