Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Jonathan Brunson v. James Ammons, Jr.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-6216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN EUGENE BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES FLOYD AMMONS, JR., Senior Resident Superior Court Judge
Bobby Brunson v. Eric Wilson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-6192
Petitioner / Appellant:
BOBBY DWAYNE BRUNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIC WILSON, Warden
US v. Frantonio Brunson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-4648
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANTONIO LEE BRUNSON
US v. Jasmine Brunson
as 12-4734
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASMINE BRUNSON, a/k/a Gotti
Beattie R. Ashmore v. Michael Thoma
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-1642
:
In re: BEATTIE BALENTINE ASHMORE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee:
BEATTIE BALENTINE ASHMORE, Receiver
Respondent - Appellant:
MICHAEL THOMAS and CAROLYN THOMAS
Respondent:
MARCY MCQUEEN, CHARLES MCQUEEN, LISA MCQUEEN and others
Movant:
TONY B. POUGH, JOSEPH BERNARD BRUNSON, TIMOTHY MCQUEEN and others
Party-in-Interest:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Beattie Ashmore v. Michael Thoma
as 11-1265
:
In re: BEATTIE BALENTINE ASHMORE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee:
BEATTIE BALENTINE ASHMORE, Receiver
Respondent - Appellant:
MICHAEL THOMAS and CAROLYN THOMAS
Respondent:
MARCY MCQUEEN, CHARLES MCQUEEN, LISA MCQUEEN and others
Movant:
TONY B. POUGH, JOSEPH BERNARD BRUNSON, TIMOTHY MCQUEEN and others
Party-in-Interest:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.