Cases 31 - 40 of 246
US v. Simernon Rogers
as 21-4290
Defendant / Appellant:
SIMERNON ROGERS, a/k/a Spunk
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Raleigh Rogers v. Wells Fargo
as 21-1646
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALEIGH ROGERS
Rossi Wade v. Truist Bank
as 21-1570
Defendant / Appellee:
MAURICE STEWARD, Branch Manager, JODI MEADOWS, Operations Manager, THOMAS N. THOMPSON, Member, Truist Bank Board of Directors and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSSI WADE, & DAUGHTER (JANE DOE)
Dwight Hurd v. Charles Lye
as 21-6581
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNNY WILSON, LIEUTENANT ROGER DODD, CORPORAL GREG SIZEMORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWIGHT HURD
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, LLC and DR. CHARLES LYE
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Pender County NC Court
as 21-1391
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, OWNER OF 1002 UNIT 1 GRACE STREET WILMINGTON NC 28401, PENDER COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Roger Smith v. Neil Wiggins
as 21-1382
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL F. WIGGINS, Clerk of Superior Court, Gates County
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER VANN SMITH
US v. Roger Charles, II
as 21-6541
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER DALE CHARLES, II
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Roger Charles, II
as 21-6542
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER DALE CHARLES, II
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jane Roe v. US
as 21-1346
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, JAMES N. ISHIDA, in his individual capacity and his official capacity as Circuit Executive of the Fourth Circuit and as Secretary of the Judicial Council of the Fourth Circuit, SHERYL L. WALTER, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE ROE
US v. Marquis Rogers
as 21-4130
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUIS DEMETRIUS ROGERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
