Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 23-1836
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Bernard Meeks v. Anne Precythe
as 20-6807
Respondent / Appellee:
ANNE L. PRECYTHE, Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections and MARK R. HERRING, Attorney General of Virginia
Petitioner / Appellant:
BERNARD MEEKS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Attorney General of Virginia
as 19-1663
Defendant:
CHRIS RILEY, THOMAS MCLEAN, individually and as agent of the State Newspaper, UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ERNEST ALTEKRUSE, in his individual capacity, THE LAW FIRM OF NEXSEN, PRUET, JACOBS & POLLARD, LLP, in its corporate capacity, CAROL NANCE, in her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, a/k/a Doctor Faltas, MD, MPH
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. USC
as 19-1655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, on behalf of herself and the class she represents
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA and CAROL NANCE
Plaintiff:
SORAYA F. FARES
Patrick Christian v. C. Jenkins, Jr.
as 19-1139
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIDGETT K. GERAGHTY, Public Defender, J. HARVIE WILKINSON, III, Judge of Virginia, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, TERRY MCAULIFFE, Former Governor of Virginia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Colin Andrew v. Matt Lohr
as 11-1086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLIN ANDREW
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT LOHR, Commissioner, Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, THOMAS MOOREHEAD, President, Sterling BMW, SALLY WOODSON SPIGLE, President, Rick Woodson Honda and others
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 11-1058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, EX REL. KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity
Movant:
RAY ELBERT PARKER, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE ET AL., PHYSICIAN HOSPITALS OF AMERICA and others
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 11-1057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, EX REL. KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity
Movant:
RAY ELBERT PARKER, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE ET AL., PHYSICIAN HOSPITALS OF AMERICA and others
Office of the Attorney General v. FERC
as 09-2052
Petitioner:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Division of Consumer Counsel
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervenor - Respondent:
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY
MCImetro Access Transmission S v. Christie
as 07-1401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCIMETRO ACCESS TRANSMISSION SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Verizon Access Transmission Services of Virginia
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK C. CHRISTIE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the State Corporation Commission of Virginia, THEODORE V. MORRISON, JR., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the State Corporation Commission of Virginia and JUDITH WILLIAMS JAGDMANN, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the State Corporation Commissioner of Virginia
Defendant:
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
XO COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED, CAVALIER TELEPHONE, LLC and DIECA COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Covad Communications Company
Amicus Curiae:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
