Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Amber Hall v. Gestamp West Virginia, LLC
as 21-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMBER D. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
GESTAMP WEST VIRGINIA, LLC, KENNETH SUPRENANT and SCOTT HUGHES
George Hengle v. Sherry Treppa
as 20-1359
Defendant / Appellant:
SHERRY TREPPA, Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Counsil; in her official capacity, AIMEE JACKSON-PENN, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant:
SCOTT ASNER and JOSHUA LANDY
George Hengle v. Scott Asner
as 20-1358
Defendant:
AMBER JACKSON, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, TRACEY TREPPA, Vice-Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA LANDY and SCOTT ASNER
Sherry Treppa v. George Hengle
as 20-164
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, WILLIE ROSE, STEVEN PIKE and others
Petitioner:
AIMEE JACKSON-PENN, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, SHERRY TREPPA, Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Counsil; in her official capacity, AMBER JACKSON, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
George Hengle v. Sherry Treppa
as 20-1062
Defendant / Appellant:
SHERRY TREPPA, Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Counsil; in her official capacity, AIMEE JACKSON-PENN, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant:
SCOTT ASNER and JOSHUA LANDY
George Hengle v. Scott Asner
as 20-1063
Defendant:
AMBER JACKSON, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, TRACEY TREPPA, Vice-Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA LANDY and SCOTT ASNER
Centraarchy Restaurant Mgmt v. Philip Angelo
as 19-1888
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK ODEGARD, DERRICK BELTON, PATRICK THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
JEREMY DOUGLAS NIELSEN, CHELSEA MCCAFFREY COOK, DANIELLE DOWSEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTRAARCHY RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Susan Vaughan v. Shannon Foltz
as 19-1409
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLYN ROMM, an individual, OFFICER MIKE SUDDUTH, OFFICER CARL WHITE and others
Defendant:
ASST. DIST. ATTORNEY EULA REID, an individual, DARE COUNTY, CURRITUCK COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN W. VAUGHAN, an individual
US v. Amber Green
as 18-4140
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMBER GREEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
