Cases 1 - 6 of 6
William Jones v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 24-1398
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVID JONES
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, The Honorable, Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense, Defense Contract Management Agency, DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY and DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
Jacob Queern v. Defense Logistics Agency
as 21-1482
Defendant / Appellee:
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY, (DLA), et al
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB E. QUEERN
Jacob Queern v. Defense Logistics Agency
as 20-1611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB QUEERN and JACOB E. QUEERN
Defendant / Appellee:
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY, (DLA), et al
Yolanda Bell v. US
as 19-1711
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVIS MCLEMORE, Former Deputy Program Manager of the Defense Travel office, Defense Logistics Agency; in his official and individual capacity, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, U.S. Attorney General, CHAD A. READLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOLANDA BELL
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. PCS Phosphate Company, Incorpo
as 13-1664
Plaintiff:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
BARNES & POWELL ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC and others
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. Consolidation Coal Company
as 13-1603
Plaintiff:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., Progress Energy Carolinas, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
BARNES & POWELL ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
