Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jeffrey Connaughton v. Gregory Milligan
as 22-2296
Claimant:
JEFFREY J. CONNAUGHTON, TONY DAVIS, ROCHELLE KATZ and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN B. MERRILL, JAY B. LEDFORD, CAMERON R. JEZIERSKI and others
Intervenor:
MASSACHUSETTS' ATTORNEY GENERAL
Receiver:
GREGORY S. MILLIGAN and RANDEL LEWIS
CCWB Asset Investments, LLC v. Gregory Milligan
as 22-2256
Claimant:
CCWB ASSET INVESTMENTS, LLC, EBC ASSET INVESTMENT, LLC, M.C. DEAN, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN B. MERRILL, JAY B. LEDFORD, CAMERON R. JEZIERSKI and others
Intervenor:
MASSACHUSETTS' ATTORNEY GENERAL
Receiver:
GREGORY S. MILLIGAN and RANDEL LEWIS
US v. Richard Wilford
as 22-7406
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD ANTHONY WILFORD, a/k/a Richie Rich
Richard Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 21-6666
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHIE LEO WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Richard Williams v. Harold Clark
as 20-6504
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARK, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHIE LEO WILLIAMS
Rose Duru v. President Trump Administration
as 19-2134
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Marietta, Georgia, H&R BLOCK BAILEY'S CROSSROADS CENTER, DAVID R. CLOUSTON, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Richard Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 19-6213
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHIE LEO WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
In Re: Richard Thoma
as 16-3045
Movant:
In re: RICHARD A. THOMAS, a/k/a Richie, a/k/a Spooky, a/k/a Mark Andrew Taylor
:
US v. Richard Wilford
as 16-6669
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD ANTHONY WILFORD, a/k/a Richie Rich
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
