Cases 11 - 20 of 504
NCO Financial Systems, Inc. v. Montgomery Park, LLC
as 24-1294
Plaintiff:
NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY PARK, LLC
Jaylin's Properties, LLC v. Reginald Evans
as 24-1287
Plaintiff:
JAYLIN'S PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
REGINALD EVANS
Jay Folse v. American Electric Power Service Corporation
as 24-1284
Plaintiff:
JAY FOLSE
Defendant:
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION, APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, PHILLIPS & JORDAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC and others
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1270
Not Yet Classified:
In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, CORTEVA INC., DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., New DuPont and others
Elizabeth Goldberg v. Television Tower, Inc.
as 24-1250
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH L. GOLDBERG, BENJAMIN ROBERTS, JOSHUA C. TOHN and others
Defendant:
TELEVISION TOWER, INC. and SKYLINE TOWER PAINTING, INC.
Elizabeth Goldberg v. Skyline Tower Painting, Inc.
as 24-1251
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH L. GOLDBERG, MYRIAM RALSTON, BENJAMIN ROBERTS and others
Defendant:
SKYLINE TOWER PAINTING, INC. and TELEVISION TOWER, INC.
State of Maryland v. 3M Company
as 24-1218
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, CORTEVA INC., DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. and others
Marilyn English v. Kevin Keane
as 24-1174
Plaintiff:
MARILYN ENGLISH
Defendant:
KEVIN KEANE, GREGORY KNORR and ELLEN HEINE
Richard Peamon v. Rutgers University Press
as 24-1124
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PEAMON
Defendant:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS
Timothy Reeves v. Circuit Court for Prince George's County
as 24-1104
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY REEVES
Defendant:
CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY, CIRCUIT COURT LAND RECORDS, ROBIN GILL BRIGHT, Lawyer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
