Cases 161 - 170 of 1,393
Elaine Neidig v. Valley Health System
as 22-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELAINE NEIDIG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM
Todd White v. ACell, Inc.
as 22-2198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
ACELL, INCORPORATED
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. John Kittredge
as 22-2189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WILLIAMSON KITTREDGE, solely officially as Acting SC Chief Justice in SC Appellate Case 2021-000815, ashn solely for declaratory and injunctive relief
Mithun Banerjee v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 22-2182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., VIVIANA QUISHPE-NARVAEZ, THE CORPORATION TRUST, INCORPORATED and others
Mithun Banerjee v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 22-2181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Plaintiff:
BANERJEE HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., THE CORPORATION TRUST, INCORPORATED, TESSA LASPIA FREDERICK and others
Timmeka Harris-Reese v. US
as 22-2138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMMEKA HARRIS-REESE, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of Z.R. and DOUGLAS M. REESE, JR., Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of Z.R.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stephanie Walker v. Petsense, LLC
as 22-2133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHANIE A. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
PETSENSE, LLC and TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY
Kandance Wells v. Charleston Area Medical Center System
as 22-2093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KANDANCE A. WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLESTON AREA MEDICAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, a/k/a CAMC - System
Cavour Ndam v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft
as 22-2084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAVOUR NDAM
Defendant / Appellee:
DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a/k/a Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
