Cases 31 - 40 of 82
US v. Anturan Daquan Morri
as 15-7121
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTURAN DAQUAN MORRIS
Terah C. Morris v. A. McLane
as 15-7104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERAH C. MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. MCLANE, Correctional Officer, C. L. GOINES, Correctional Officer, W. PIXLEY, Warden and others
Defendant:
C. GOINES, Correctional Officer and WENDALL PIXLEY, Warden
US v. Morris Dabb
as 15-6511
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MORRIS DABBS, a/k/a Ray Dabbs
Charles Morris, III v. Danny White
as 15-6224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT MORRIS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
DANNY WHITE, Probation Officer, RONALD J. CAVANAUGH, Chief Probation Officer and RYAN HALL, Probation Officer
Nancy Morris v. Andrew Bland
as 15-1115
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NANCY MORRIS, as personal representative of the Estate of David Allan Woods
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW J. BLAND, PFC, officially and individually, RICHARD T. BURKHOLDER, SGT, officially and individually, LEEMON E. CARNER, PFC, officially and individually and others
Defendant:
THE HOPE CLINIC, LLC, TEMISAN ETIKERENTSE, SUE BRABHAM, R.N., officially and individually and others
Owaiian Jones v. USPS
as 15-6043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL, JOSEPH HIGGS, JR. and others
Michael Rankins v. City of Windsor
as 15-6038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WINDSOR, COUNTY OF BERTIE, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Marcus Morris v. O. Higazi
as 14-7768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
O. H. HIGAZI, Officer 126/CPD (1433)
Theodore Foust v. George Solomon
as 14-7685
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE MORRIS FOUST
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE T. SOLOMON
US v. Rodney Jone
as 14-6883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY MORRIS JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
