Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 483
US v. Deangelo Joyner
as 24-4036
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DEANGELO MAURICE JOYNER
Maurice Hawkins v. Judge Marshall
as 23-7158
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAURICE HAWKINS
Defendant / Appellee: JUDGE MARSHALL
Maurice Sinkfield v. US
as 23-7150
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAURICE J. SINKFIELD
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maurice Scott v. Mrs. Stevenson
as 23-7041
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAURICE PRESTON SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee: MRS. STEVENSON, Psychiatrist and DUDLEY, Mental Health
Wayne Thomas, Jr. v. Thomas Meyer
as 23-7007
Plaintiff / Appellant: WAYNE ALPHONSO THOMAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS MEYER, Warden, ROSS MAURICE, Asst. Warden, DICHELL WILLIAMS, Major of Security and others
Jaxon Chavez v. Clint Davis
as 23-6983
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAXON REYES CHAVEZ
Defendant / Appellee: CLINT C. DAVIS, Warden at The Virginia Department of Corrections Nottoway Correctional Center, ROSS MAURICE, Assistant Warden at The Virginia Department of Correction, Nottoway Correctional Center, STEVE HERRICK, The Virginia Department of Corrections, Health Services Director and others
In re: Kenneth Stuart
as 23-253
Petitioner: In re: KENNETH STUART, a/k/a Bones, a/k/a Maurice Beale, a/k/a Brutal, a/k/a Hooda, a/k/a Kenneth Steward
US v. Kenneth Stuart
as 23-6859
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH STUART, a/k/a Bones, a/k/a Maurice Beale, a/k/a Brutal, a/k/a Hooda, a/k/a Kenneth Steward
Michael Scott v. Baltimore County, Maryland
as 23-1731
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL A. SCOTT, RUDOLPH ARMSTRONG, AARON KESSLER and others
Defendant / Appellee: BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?