Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Donald Brown v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 17-7321
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Walter Godbey v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 17-6497
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER THOMAS GODBEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Mark Konsavich v. Meek
as 17-6485
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK JAMES KONSAVICH
Respondent - Appellee:
MEEKS, Warden FCI Williamsburg
Larry Ray Ward v. US
as 17-6449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY RAY WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARNES, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMES and others
Kiias Stockton v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 17-6414
Petitioner - Appellant:
KIIAS STOCKTON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FBOP
David Lightner v. B. J. Meek
as 16-7258
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID FITZGERALD LIGHTNER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN B. J. MEEKS, FCI Williamsburg
Kevin Leite v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 16-6416
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL LEITE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Paul Goist v. Charles Samuels
as 15-7368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL BENJAMIN GOIST, a/k/a Paul Benjamin Goist
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES SAMUELS, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his official and individual capacity, REAR ADMIRAL NEWTON E. KENDIG, M.D., In his official and individual capacity, HARRELL WATTS, In his Official and Individual Capacity and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Daryl Humphrey v. A. Cruz
as 15-6453
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARYL DESHAUN HUMPHREY
Respondent - Appellee:
A. CRUZ, Warden FCI Williamsburg
Travis Sarvis v. Warden Cruz
as 15-6208
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRAVIS LEQUINN SARVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
FCI WILLIAMSBURG WARDEN CRUZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
