Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Charles Short v. J. Hartman
as 21-1397
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA KELLY RECKTENWALD, Lieutenant, Operations Supervisor of the Detention Center with the Davie County Sheriff's Department, in her individual and official capacity, ANDREW C. STOKES, Sheriff of Davie County, in his individual and official capacity, CAMERON SLOAN, Captain, Chief Jailer with the Davie County Sheriff's Department, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES WILLIS SHORT, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Victoria Christine Short
Darryl Howard v. Darrell Dowdy
as 20-2114
Defendant / Appellant:
MILTON SMITH, in his individual and official capacities and DARRELL DOWDY, in his individual and official capacities
Defendant:
MICHELE SOUCIE, in her individual and official capacities, JOHN AND JANE DOE OFFICERS & SUPERVISORS 1-10, in their individual and official capacities, E. E. SARVIS, in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARRYL HOWARD
Philip Sweitzer v. John Doe 1
as 20-1984
Defendant:
DARIO J. BROCCOLINO, Esq., State's Attorney, Howard County, JANET C. MOSS, Executive Director, MICHELE D. HOTTEN, Hon. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, M. D., CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER and JOHN DOE 2, M. D.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP J. SWEITZER
Yimoe Siddha v. Donald Sealing, II
as 20-6593
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD B. SEALING, II, Clerk of Court for Carroll County, SCOTT A. POYER, Clerk of Court for Anne Arundel County and GREGORY HILTON, Clerk of Court for Maryland Court of Special Appeals
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YIMOE SIDDHA
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOE
Edward Gelin v. Kyle Shuman
as 20-1141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH GELIN, as personal representatives of the Estate of Ashleigh Gelin, and for themselves and EDWARD GELIN
Defendant:
CARL LUCKETT, individually and in his official capacity, BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE SHUMAN, individually and as an agent/employee of Baltimore County, Maryland, DIANE BAHR, individually and as an agent/employee of Baltimore County, Maryland, JENNIFER SEVIER and others
Devante Jenkins v. CEC Entertainment, Inc.
as 20-1113
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES and UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS
Defendant / Appellee:
CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC., d/b/a Chuck E Cheese's Entertainment, Inc., a/k/a Chuck E Cheese's
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYESHIA COARDES and DEVANTE JENKINS
Sharon Lee v. Argent Trust Company
as 19-2485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
MEMBERS OF THE CHOATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BOARD OF DIRECTORS (JOHN AND JANE DOES 11-20), SELLING SHAREHOLDERS (JOHN AND JANE DOES 21-35), MEMBERS OF THE CHOATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ESOP COMMITTEE (JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10) and others
Della Shore v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital
as 19-2086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELLA SHORE, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND ON BEHALF OF THE ATRIUM PLANS, LYDIA WALKER, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND ON BEHALF OF THE ATRIUM PLANS, MARK RACZ, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND ON BEHALF OF THE ATRIUM PLANS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20, MEDCOST LLC, CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, A NORTH CAROLINA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION doing business as ATRIUM formerly known as CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM and others
Ashley Prior v. State of South Carolina
as 19-7381
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN B. MCCREE, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, SCDC Kirkland Staff, SHERIFF OF COLUMBIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHLEY T. PRIOR
Raymond Griffin v. Captain Steinbeck
as 19-6785
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN STEINBECK
Defendant:
SERGEANT SMITH, OFFICER LAMAR, OFFICER GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALAN GRIFFIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
