Cases 31 - 40 of 86
James Egan v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7224
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES S. EGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Jamal Gethers v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL NATHAN GETHERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, DAVID ROBINSON, LESLIE FLEMING and others
Gregory Hammer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7168
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY LEON HAMMER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Toccara Puller v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7139
Petitioner / Appellant:
TOCCARA YVONNE PULLER
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Richard Kendrick v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7108
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Richard Kendrick v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7099
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Tamar Harvey v. Ralph Coleman
as 23-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH R. COLEMAN, Lieutenant, TIMOTHY W. GREEN, Unit Manager of Housing Unit 6, M.A. BAILEY, Senior Warden and others
Defendant:
SERGEANT HOBBS, SERGEANT WOODBURY, E. CLAY, AD Food Service Manager and others
Markelyn Jones v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7082
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARKELYN LAMONTRE JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, VA D.O.C. Director, RANDALL C. MATHENA, VA D.O.C. Security Operations Manager, H. SCOTT RICHESON, Deputy Dir., VA D.O.C. and others
Jonathan Vejarano v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7066
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN JULIAN VEJARANO
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
