Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Miguel Delgado v. David Ballard
as 12-6360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL DELGADO
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, CLARENCE J. RIDER, JAMES MCCLOUD and others
Christopher Forney v. David Ballard
as 12-6115
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL FORNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
John Keeney, Jr. v. David Ballard
as 11-7615
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN E. KEENEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Max Kitchen v. David Ballard
as 11-7452
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAX P. KITCHEN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
John Moss, III v. David Ballard
as 11-7354
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN MOSS, III
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Robert Blake v. Mount Olive Correctional
as 11-7187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
MOUNT OLIVE CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, DEPUTY WARDEN MARVIN PLUMLEY, STEVE CAUDILL, Captain and others
Cornell Daye v. David Ballard
as 11-6958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELL F. DAYE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden (MOCC), in his official and individual capacities (Defendant #1), JASON COLLINS, Associate Warden of Programs, in official and individual capacities (Defendant #2), MARK CRAWFORD, Librarian, in his official and individual capacities (Defendant #3) and others
Robert Blake v. Matainente
as 11-6821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
MATAINENTE, DAVID BALLARD, DEPUTY WARDEN MARVIN PLUMLEY and others
Robert Blake v. David Ballard
as 11-6813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden
Edwin Taylor v. James Rubenstein
as 11-6788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN MACK TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, DAVID BALLARD, Warden, JASON COLLINS, Associate Warden of Programs and others
Defendant:
KATHRYN TOLER, Lead Teacher and DENVER BAKER, Quality of Life Teacher
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
