Cases 1 - 10 of 277
US v. Lavarius Hall
as 24-4388
Defendant:
LAVARIUS RODRIGUEZ HALL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alyse Sanchez v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 24-1487
Plaintiff:
JOSE CARLOS ALDANA MARTINEZ, OLIVIA ALDANA MARTINEZ, MISAEL RODRIGUEZ PENA and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, PATRICK J. LECHLEITNER, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and MATTHEW ELLISTON, Acting Director, Maryland Field Office of ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
US v. Eddie Rodriguez-Pinto
as 24-6503
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDDIE SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ-PINTO
Elias Mejia Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1329
Petitioner:
ELIAS ISMAEL MEJIA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Israel Veliz-Saenz v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1280
Petitioner:
ISRAEL VALENTIN VELIZ-SAENZ, ANA RUBI LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ, DALIA MARGARITA VELIZ-LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Jose Soloman-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1236
Petitioner:
JOSE SOLOMAN-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney general
US v. Julio Rodriguez-Diaz
as 24-6121
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ-DIAZ
Jose Rodriguez-Amaya v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2052
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ-AMAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Prudencio Rodriguez
as 23-7004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PRUDENCIO RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
