Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
E. I. duPont de Nemours & Company v. Brent Nix
as 23-269
Petitioner: E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY and CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC
Respondent: BRENT NIX, VICTORIA CAREY, MARIE BURRIS and others
Anthony Zappin v. Carey, Douglas, Kessler, & Ruby, PLLC
as 23-2009
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTHONY ZAPPIN
Defendant / Appellee: CAREY, DOUGLAS, KESSLER, & RUBY, PLLC and S. BENJAMIN BRYANT
Rudolph Carey, III v. Nelson Smith
as 22-1908
Plaintiff / Appellant: RUDOLPH CAREY, III
Defendant / Appellee: NELSON SMITH, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services
Michael Hodges v. Rondelle Herman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1445
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL HODGES
Defendant / Appellee: CRAIG MATTHEW BURSHEM, Director DCSE, RONDELLE DIONNE HERMAN, Judge, CAREY T., Agent DCSE and others
Chris Gagliastre v. Captain George's of SC
as 19-2213
Plaintiff: CAINE GREEN, MALISA SHEPPERD, DESERA SMITH, On behalf of themselves and those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: CAPTAIN GEORGE'S OF SOUTH CAROLINA LP, SHERRY PITSILIDES, PITSILIDES MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant: PITSILAMBOUS INC., LIDESLAMBOUS INC., CAPTAIN KDH, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: OLGA ZAYNEEVA, CHRIS GAGLIASTRE, ZACHARY TARRY and others
Chris Gagliastre v. Captain George's of SC
as 19-2170
Plaintiff: CAINE GREEN, MALISA SHEPPERD, DESERA SMITH, On behalf of themselves and those similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHRIS GAGLIASTRE, On behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, ZACHARY TARRY, On behalf of themselves and those similarly situated and OLGA ZAYNEEVA, On behalf of themselves and those similarly situated
Defendant: PITSILAMBOUS INC., LIDESLAMBOUS INC., CAPTAIN KDH, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant: GEORGE PITSILIDES, SHERRY PITSILIDES, PITSILIDES MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Carey Hixson v. Michael Moran We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1209
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL MORAN, in his individual capacity and as the physician at Harrisonburg-Rockingham Regional Jail and JOHN DOES 1 AND 2, as nurses and employees of Southern Health Partners, Inc.
Defendant: CITY OF HARRISONBURG, KATHERINE RAYNES, a nurse and employee of Southern Health Partners, Inc., JANELLE SEEKFORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CAREY HIXSON
Norris Carey, Jr. v. Joanne Throwe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1194
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORRIS PAUL CAREY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUTY SECRETARY JOANNE THROWE, ROBERT K. ZIEGLER, Superintendent, CAPTAIN EDWARD JOHNSON and others
Defendant: MARYLAND NATURAL RESOURCES POLICE
Brian Davison v. Phyllis Randall
as 17-2003
Amicus Curiae: REBECCA TUSHNET, Frank Stanton Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law School, HELEN L. NORTON, Professor and Ira C. Rothgerber, Jr. Chair in Constitutional Law, University of Colorado School of Law, ACLU OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: LEO P. ROGERS, In his official capacity, RON MEYER, In his official capacity, TONY BUFFINGTON, In his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN DAVISON
Defendant / Appellee: PHYLLIS RANDALL, In her official and individual capacity and LOUDOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, In their official and individual capacities
Ajamu Osborne v. Michael Carey
as 17-6527
Plaintiff - Appellant: AJAMU SAWANDI OSBORNE
Movant: THE UNASSOCIATED 33 PHOENIX FOUNDATION AND TIME CREDIT LIFELINE
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL W. CAREY, Esq., Individually, and both jointly and severally in individual capacity doing business as Carey, Scott, Douglas & Kessler, PLLC, SANFORD BENJAMIN BRYANT, Esq., Individually, and both jointly and severally in individual capacity doing business as Carey, Scott, Douglas & Kessler, PLLC and TROY NINO GIATRAS, Esq., Individual and both jointly and severally in individual capacity doing business as The Giatras Law Firm, PLLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?