Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Walter Booker v. R. Timmons
as 19-7012
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT TAYLOR, R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager, T. ROBINSON, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
S. TAPP, Human Rights Advocate, J. HARRIS, Warden, D. DUGGER, Institutional Hearings Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Walter Booker v. M. Engelke
as 19-6642
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYANT, Sergeant, M. E. ENGELKE, Director of Food Services, L. FLEMING, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Walter Booker v. T. Johnson
as 17-7378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SGT. T. JOHNSON, TEC. E. STOVALL, OFC. JOHN DOE and others
Defendant:
DET. M. LUCK and DET. T. KEOUGH
Walter Booker v. R. Timmon
as 17-6402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager, B. M. CLAUDE, Lieutenant, T. ROBINSON, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator, EDDIE L. PEARSON, Lead Warden and others
Walter Booker v. Harold Clarke
as 16-7375
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Walter Booker, Jr. v. M. E. Engelke
as 16-6428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
M. E. ENGELKE, Director of Food Services, N. GREGG, State Dietitian, H. PONTON, Regional Administrator, Western and others
Walter Booker v. R. Timmon
as 15-7720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager, B. M. CLAUDE, Lieutenant, T. ROBINSON, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator, EDDIE L. PEARSON, Lead Warden and others
Walter Booker v. Harold Clarke
as 13-6454
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA DOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.