Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jamaad Thomas v. Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
as 22-6012
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMAAD D. THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Clark Thomas v. McKendley Newton
as 21-7159
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLARK D. THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
MCKENNDLY NEWTON, Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution and ALAN M. WILSON, Attorney General of South Carolina
David Meyers v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6674
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden, COUNSELOR R. BRITT, ANGELA WETHINGTON, Operations Manager/PREA Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Clark Thomas v. Charleston County
as 21-6646
Defendant / Appellee:
R. MARKLEY DENNIS, ORIN G. BRIGGS, I, SCARLETT A. WILSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARK D. THOMAS, a/k/a George K. Nichols
Jamaad Thomas v. Warden of Broad River
as 21-6220
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMAAD D. THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Marcus Thomas v. L. Ro
as 15-7622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS D. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
L. ROSS, RN, E. JOHNSON, RN and D. SPIERS, DON
Justin Thomas v. Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc.
as 15-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN D. THOMAS and IRENE S. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARMEUSE LIME & STONE, INCORPORATED, O-N MINERALS (CHEMSTONE) COMPANY and THOMAS M. HELMS, SR.
Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc. v. Thomas Helms, Sr.
as 15-1447
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JUSTIN D. THOMAS and IRENE S. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellant:
CARMEUSE LIME & STONE, INCORPORATED and O-N MINERALS (CHEMSTONE) COMPANY
Defendant:
THOMAS M. HELMS, SR.
Marcus Thomas v. M. Younce
as 14-7856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS D. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
M. YOUNCE, Unit Manager, A. MULLIN, LT; Building (LT) A and D. BARTON, SGT, Building (SGT) A
Marcus D. Thomas v. L. Ro
as 14-6075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS D. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
L. ROSS, RN, E. JOHNSON, RN and D. SPIERS, DON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
