Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Courtland Company, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corporation
as 23-2143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE COURTLAND COMPANY, INC., a West Virginia Business Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, a New York Corporation
Defendant:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation
West Virginia State University v. The Dow Chemical Company
as 20-1712
Defendant / Appellant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, LP and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Darrell Connor v. Covil Corporation
as 19-1015
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, f/k/a Daniel Construction Company, Inc. and COVIL CORPORATION
Defendant:
GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, DANA COMPANIES, LLC, SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO WARNER BRAKE AND CLUTCH COMPANY, INC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL A. CONNOR, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Charles Franklin Connor, Deceased
Melodee White v. The Dow Chemical Company
as 08-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELODEE WHITE, Administratrix of the Estate of John H. White, deceased, individually and as next friend and guardian of M. W., an infant under the age of eighteen
Defendant - Appellee:
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, a foreign corporation and DOW AGROSCIENCES L.L.C., a foreign corporation
Defendant - None:
JOHN DOE HERBICIDE AND CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, JOHN DOE HERBICIDE AND CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Asplundh, a foreign corporation and others
Brady v. Dow Chemical Co Ret
as 07-2040
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DENNIS P. BRADY
Defendant - Appellant:
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY RETIREMENT BOARD and UNION CARBIDE EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN, f/k/a Retirement Program Plan for Employees of Union Carbide Corporation and its Participating Subsidiary Companies
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
