Cases 1 - 10 of 13
US v. Luis Garza
as 24-4262
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LUIS BRADLEY GARZA, a/k/a Brad
Davetta Range v. Dana Van Metre
as 20-1345
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, BRIAN A. JACKSON, SA RACHEL ROLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVETTA LYNN RANGE
US v. Ezequiel Garza
as 19-7106
Defendant / Appellant:
EZEQUIEL GONZALEZ GARZA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Ezequiel Garza
as 16-4842
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EZEQUIEL GONZALEZ GARZA
Jay Clogg Realty Group, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co
as 16-1604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY ADOFF, AGV SPORTS GROUP, INC., MICHAEL PARROTTE and others
Plaintiff:
JAY CLOGG REALTY GROUP, INC. and JAY CLOGG
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and METLIFE GROUP, INC.
US v. Sergio Garza
as 15-4161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SERGIO GARZA, a/k/a Anatolio Balderas-Sanchez
US v. Oscar Montalvo
as 11-7743
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OSCAR GARZA MONTALVO, a/k/a George Guiterrez-Velasquez
Darrell Baker v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc
as 11-2378
:
In re: FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED, WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL D. BAKER, IKE GARZA and DOROTHY A. SEXTON-WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED
US v. Luis Ovalle
as 10-4511
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS ALBERTO GARZA OVALLE, a/k/a Luis Alberto Garza, a/k/a Israel Rosales, Jr., a/k/a Juan Luis Baca-Quintana
US v. Humberto Palacios-Herrera
as 10-4138
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HUMBERTO PALACIOS-HERRERA, a/k/a Mario Alberto Peralta-Del Castillo, a/k/a Gustava De La Garza-Herrera, a/k/a Gustavo De La Garza-Herrera
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
