Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Vladimir Kruglyak v. Karen Phoebus
as 24-1156
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR KRUGLYAK, d/b/a Fruklyak, Inc.
Defendant:
KAREN J. PHOEBUS and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Kinfe-Michael Negash v. Kingstowne Residential Owners
as 20-1884
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART HEADQUARTERS, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, FBI HEADQUARTERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINFE-MICHAEL NEGASH
George Jackson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 17-1627
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE W. JACKSON
Defendant:
CAROLINA WATER SYSTEMS, INC. and CITIBANK, N.A.
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. George Jackson
as 17-184
Petitioner:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Respondent:
GEORGE W. JACKSON
:
and
Louis Deabreu v. Novastar Home Mortgage, Inc
as 13-1316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS PIERRE DEABREU and RENEE LAVINIA DEABREU
Defendant - Appellee:
NOVASTAR HOME MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, MICHIGAN FIDELITY ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, d/b/a Franklin Mortgage Funding, WELLS FARGO BANK, d/b/a America's Servicing Company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Black v. New Jersey State
as 10-1800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY STATE, LOUIS PROPERTIES LLC and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Gerald Deel v. Home Depot USA, Incorporated
as 10-1727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD O. DEEL
Defendant - Appellee:
HOME DEPOT USA, INCORPORATED and ESTES EXPRESS LINES
Gerald Deel v. Home Depot USA, Incorporated
as 09-1254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD O. DEEL
Defendant - Appellee:
HOME DEPOT USA, INCORPORATED and ESTES EXPRESS LINES
James Pugh, III v. Louisville Ladder, Incorporate
as 08-2141
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES PAUL PUGH, III
Defendant - Appellant:
LOUISVILLE LADDER, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Louisville Ladder Group, LLC
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
