Cases 1 - 10 of 48
US v. Michael Harriot
as 24-6181
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith
US v. James Smith
as 23-6240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES LEONARD SMITH
Tony Messer v. Bristol Compressors International, LLC
as 21-2363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY A. MESSER, PHILIP E. BARBROW, BENJIE G. HICKS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL COMPRESSOR, INCORPORATED, trading as Bristol Compressors
Defendant:
GARRISON INVESTMENT GROUP, LP
US v. Michael Harriot
as 21-4616
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith
US v. James Smith
as 21-4484
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES LEONARD SMITH
US v. James Smith
as 21-4199
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. James Smith
as 21-4198
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. James Smith
as 21-4197
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reinaldo Olavarria v. Doretha Jones
as 20-2377
Defendant:
THERMAN NEWTON, BARBARA GIBSON, Director of North Carolina Office of State Human Resources, JAMES A. SMITH, III, Chair of Wake County Board of Commissioners and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MANDY COHEN, in her individual and private capacity, YETVETTE GRIFFIN, in her individual and private capacity, NICOLE FIELDS, in her individual and private capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REINALDO OLAVARRIA
James Smith v. Edsel Taylor
as 20-7890
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES R. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN EDSEL T. TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
