Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rickey Brown v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc.
as 23-2212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY and others
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2163
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY LOHMAN and LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY LOHMAN, A Professional Corporation
Defendant:
JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY LOHMAN, JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS and others
Defendant:
DAVID MIZE, IBRAHIM MUHTASEB, ALYSON DYKES and others
US v. Robert White
as 21-6635
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES PEARSON WHITE, a/k/a RJ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Russell Johnson
as 19-4735
Defendant / Appellant:
RUSSELL PATRICK JOHNSON, a/k/a RJ, a/k/a Kevin Wells
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Robert Saunder
as 15-7982
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE SAUNDERS, a/k/a RJ
US v. Robert White
as 15-7210
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES PEARSON WHITE, a/k/a RJ
Vista del Mar Condominiums LLC v. Nichols Brosch Wurst Wolfe
as 13-1388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VISTA DEL MAR CONDOMINIUMS LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES INC. and NEWCOMB & BOYD
Defendant:
DUNN SOUTHEAST INC., d/b/a RJ Griffin & Company and STO CORPORATION
Third Party Defendant:
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, BCI INC and others
US v. Robert White
as 12-4399
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES PEARSON WHITE, a/k/a RJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
