Cases 1 - 10 of 33
US v. Richard Smith, Jr.
as 24-6726
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, JR., a/k/a Smitty
Richard Patterson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6667
Petitioner:
RICHARD ALLEN PATTERSON
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Richard Smith, Jr. v. CO Sines
as 23-6110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SINES, Hospital Transport Officer/Federal Corrections Officer, CO JOHN DOE NO. 1, Hospital Transport Officer/Federal Corrections Officer, CO JOHN DOE NO. 2, Hospital Transport Officer/Federal Corrections Officer and others
US v. Richard Patterson
as 23-6021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN PATTERSON
US v. Richard Smith, Jr.
as 22-7283
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, JR., a/k/a Smitty
US v. Richard Patterson
as 22-6264
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN PATTERSON
Richard Smith, Jr. v. CO Sines
as 22-6241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SINES, Hospital Transport Officer/Federal Corrections Officer, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE NO. 1, Hospital Transport Officer/Federal Corrections Officer and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE NO. 2, Hospital Transport Officer/Federal Corrections Officer
US v. Richard Patterson
as 21-6248
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.