Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Demetric Hardaway v. Lori Myers
as 21-7568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIC HARDAWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI MYERS
Defendant:
FRANCIS JOHNSON, NICOLE CHAPMAN and EDSEL T. TAYLOR
James Smith v. Edsel Taylor
as 20-7890
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES R. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN EDSEL T. TAYLOR
Michael Gorbey v. Lieutenant Avery
as 19-6470
Defendant:
A. BURNSIDE, R&D and/or Records, ASSISTANT WARDEN WOLDER, MICHAEL FRAZIER, Associate General Counsel F. Bop D.C. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT AVERY, REMEDY CLERK MRS. BOWLES, LIEUTENANT SALCITO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Fernando Young v. Edsel Taylor
as 15-7342
Petitioner - Appellant:
FERNANDO FRANCISCO YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
EDSEL T. TAYLOR, Warden
Richard Dunston, Jr. v. E.C. Albert
as 15-7160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DUNSTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
E. C. ALBERT, Raleigh Police Department, S. A. KOPESAK, Raleigh Police Department, D. W. MEAD, Raleigh Police Department and others
James Primus v. Edsel Taylor
as 14-7833
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ANTHONY PRIMUS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN EDSEL T. TAYLOR
Stanley D Linder v. ET Taylor
as 14-7609
Petitioner - Appellant:
STANLEY D. LINDER
Respondent - Appellee:
E. T. TAYLOR
Gerald Barbaris v. Edsel Taylor
as 14-7350
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD PATRICK BARBARIS
Respondent - Appellee:
EDSEL T. TAYLOR, Warden
Demetrius Hill v. Terry O'Brien
as 13-7530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY A. O'BRIEN, Warden, MR. STRICKLAND, Associate Warden, MR. WILSON, Captain and others
Defendant:
COUNSELOR PULIVAR, COUNSELOR MULLINS, MS. HALL, Case Manager and others
Gerald Barbaris v. Edsel Taylor
as 13-6018
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD PATRICK BARBARIS
Respondent - Appellee:
EDSEL T. TAYLOR, Warden McDougall Corr Inst
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
