Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Allen et al v. McCrory et al
as 5:2015cv00627
Plaintiff:
Frederick L Allen and Nautilus Productions, LLC
Defendant:
Patrick Lloyd McCrory, Susan Wear Kluttz, Karin Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lloyd v. Locklear et al
as 5:2015ct03262
Plaintiff:
Wendell D. Lloyd
Defendant:
Dean Locklear, Officer Hoffler, North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coach, Inc., et al v. Lloyd
as 7:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Jacqueline Dowless Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Daniels v. Fox et al
as 5:2015ct03160
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Daniels
Defendant:
Keith Fox, Lloyd L. Williams and Jan Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: NC Swine Farm Nuisance Litigation
as 5:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs , Betty Collier , Andrew High and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC , Joyce Ann Hardison and Daisy J. Fennell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lloyd v. USA
as 5:2014cv00895
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wendell Hussey Lloyd, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barton et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Glenda Barton , Lloyd Barton , Emma Lou King Collins and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKiver et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 4:2014cv00153
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joyce McKiver , Delois Lewis , Dennis McKiver, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKiver et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00180
Plaintiff:
Joyce McKiver, Delois Lewis, Dennis McKiver, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC doing business as Smithfield Hog Production Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webb et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 4:2014cv00152
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Plaintiff:
Don Webb , Susan Webb , Isaac Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
