Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Microban International, Ltd. v. Kennedy
as 3:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Microban International, Ltd.
Defendant:
William Bartley Kennedy, Polygiene Group AB and Bio Master LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wartsila Technology Oy Ab v. Hawkins
as 5:2018mc00001
Plaintiff:
Wartsila Technology Oy Ab and Wartsila Defense, Inc.
Defendant:
Alicia M. Hawkins
Respondent:
Yvette Johnson , Dwayne Butler , Carolyn Ward and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Perrine v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Elbern H. Perrine
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wartsila Technology Oy Ab et al v. Coastal Seal Services, LLC
as 5:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
Wartsila Technology Oy Ab and Wartsila Defense, Inc.
Defendant:
Coastal Seal Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Husqvarna AB v. The Toro Company
as 3:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Husqvarna AB
Defendant:
The Toro Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
R on I, INC. et al v. EMH, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
R on I, Inc., MovoMech AB and MovoMech Systems, AB
Defendant:
EMH, Inc., EMH Crane Services, Inc. and Edis M. Hazne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v. Kennametal Inc.
as 1:2009cv00163
Plaintiff:
Sandvik Intellectual Property AB and Sandvik Intellectual Property AB
Defendant:
Kennametal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stealth Components Inc v. Saab Microwave Systems AB
as 3:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Stealth Components Inc
Defendant:
Saab Microwave Systems AB
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
